South Africa elections 2019: Journalist safety kit

Art:Jack Forbes

Art: Jack Forbes

South Africa, one of the media freedom beacons in sub-Saharan Africa, will hold national and provincial elections on May 8. As the country celebrates 25 years of democracy, the press in South Africa faces old and new challenges, including physical harassment and cyber bullying. The press freedom environment, including the safety of journalists, will be one of the key indicators for the health of the country’s democracy and the freeness and fairness of its polls.

CPJ’s Emergencies Response Team (ERT) has compiled a Safety Kit for journalists covering South Africa’s election. The kit contains information for editors, reporters, and photojournalists on how to prepare for the election and how to mitigate digital, physical and psychological risk.

Journalists requiring assistance can contact CPJ via emergencies@cpj.org.

CPJ’s Journalist Security Guide has additional information on basic preparedness and assessing and responding to risk. CPJ’s resource center has additional information and tools for pre-assignment preparation and post-incident assistance.

Menu:

Artwork: Jack Forbes

Editor’s Safety Checklist when deploying staff on a hostile story

During the run up to the election, editors and newsrooms will be assigning journalists to stories at short notice. This checklist includes key questions and steps to consider, to reduce risk for staff.








For more information about risk assessment and planning, see the CPJ Resource Center.

Artwork: Jack Forbes

Physical Safety: reporting safely on rallies and protests

During elections, journalists frequently cover rallies, campaign events, and protests. CPJ is aware of incidents in South Africa where journalists were verbally abused or physically assaulted while covering rallies and events in 2018. Some were denied access to political events.

To minimize the risk:

Political Events and Rallies

Protests

Municipal IQ, a specialized local government data and intelligence organization, recorded 237 protests against municipalities across South Africa in 2018. This was an increase from the previous record of 191 protests in 2014. For more data view the Institute for Security Studies‘ maps of incidents of public violence across South Africa.
To minimize the risk when covering protests:

To minimize the risk when dealing with tear gas:

Journalists have been assaulted by protesters in South Africa and targeted by criminals. When dealing with aggression, consider the following:

Physical Safety: reporting safely in a hostile community

Journalists are frequently required to report in areas or communities that are hostile to the media or outsiders. This can happen if a community perceives that the media does not fairly represent them or portrays them in a negative light. During an election campaign, journalists may be required to work for extended periods among communities that are hostile to the media.

To help reduce the risk:

Physical Safety: Reporting safely on a crime scene or in an area of high crime

Being aware of the criminal threat is second nature in South Africa. However, journalists are particularly vulnerable as they often work in high crime areas or report on crime scenes. Expensive equipment can make journalists attractive targets. In 2015, a SABC correspondent was mugged live on air while reporting from outside a Johannesburg hospital. In January, a News24 journalist was mugged and his camera stolen while covering voter registration in Cape Town.

To minimize the risk:

Artwork: Jack Forbes

Digital Safety: Basic device preparedness

Before going out on assignment it is good practice to:


Digital Safety: Identifying bots

Journalists covering elections are increasingly likely to be targeted online through smear campaigns that aim to discredit them and their work. It can be hard to work out who is behind a campaign or attack. Attackers can be real people or malicious computer bots–accounts that are run by computers rather than humans. Bots mimic human behavior on social media accounts as a way to spread misinformation or propaganda that support a cause. Identifying bots from real people can help journalists to better understand the harassment and identify when a digital threat may become physical.

To identify a bot:

Journalists may want to mute or block bots that attack them online. Media workers are advised to report any malicious accounts to social media companies. It is recommended to document any posts that are abusive or threatening, including screenshots of the accounts, the date of the comment, and any action you have taken. This information may be useful at a later date should you wish to pursue any legal action.

Artwork: Jack Forbes


Digital Safety: Online harassment and trolling

Journalists may face an increased level of online harassment during election time and should take steps to protect themselves and their accounts. Similar to other parts of the world, female journalists in South Africa have been subject to online abuse and trolling from the public and members of political parties. If trolling becomes the norm, it encourages a climate favorable to violence against the media. Journalists should monitor social media accounts regularly for increased levels of trolling or signs that an online attack may become a physical threat.

To minimize the risk:

During an attack:


Digital Safety: Securing and storing materials

It is important to have good protocols around the storing and securing of materials during election times. If a journalist is detained while covering an election campaign, their devices may be taken and searched which this could have serious consequences for the journalist and their sources.

The following steps can help protect you and your information.

Artwork: Jack Forbes


Psychological Safety: Managing trauma in the newsroom

Stories and situations that frequently result in distress and when you should be thinking about trauma include:

Management should guide staff on such days and share the responsibility of care. The following approach should be considered and acted upon if required. The extent to which the guidance is implemented will depend on the severity of story.

On such days:


Psychological Safety: Dealing with trauma-related stress

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been increasingly acknowledged as an issue confronting journalists who cover distressing stories.

Traditionally, the issue is associated with journalists and media workers in conflict zones or when they are exposed to near death or highly threatening situations. However, more recently, there is a greater awareness that journalists working on any sort of distressing story can experience symptoms of PTSD. Stories involving abuse or violence (crime scene reporting, criminal court cases or robberies) or stories that involve a large loss of life (car crashes/mine collapses) are all potential causes of trauma among those covering them. Those being abused online or trolled are also vulnerable to stress-related trauma.

The growth of uncensored user-generated material has created a digital front line. It is now recognized that journalists and editors viewing traumatic imagery of death and horror are susceptible to trauma. This secondary trauma is now known as vicarious trauma.

It is important for all journalists to realize that suffering from stress after witnessing horrific incidents/footage is a normal human reaction. It is not a weakness.

For everyone:

For editing producers:

For producers in the field:

If it’s particularly intense:

Exit mobile version